Drawing for HUBBLE INNOVATIONS

USPTO serial 85019352

HUBBLE INNOVATIONS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HUBBLE INNOVATIONS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey C. Katz

JEFFREY C. KATZ DAVIS & GILBERT LLP1740 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10019-4379UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business marketing consulting services; management consulting services; business consulting services in the field of product innovations; consulting services in the fields of business and marketing opportunities and related fields, namely, consulting related to business organizational and management innovations, innovations in marketing strategy, and marketing of new products; consulting in the field of marketing and brand development; advertising agency and marketing communication services; market research analysis; interactive and digital advertising and marketing services; public relations and publicity services; business project management services for others; arranging and organization of exhibitions and events for marketing and advertising purposes; monitoring and analyzing the effectiveness of online advertising for othersACTIVE—
042Product design; packaging design; design and development of computer software; development of data processing programs; design, development and maintenance of Internet websites; consulting services with regard to the design of Internet websites; software consultancy; computer programming; graphic design services; computer animation design services; technical project management in the field of electronic data processing; computer systems analysis, industrial design services; scientific research; technological research in the field of business, marketing and product innovations, namely, research related to computer technology used in the fields of business, marketing and product innovations; technological services, namely, computer software consulting related to the fields of business, marketing and product innovations; consulting services in the field of product innovations, namely, regarding new product development; computer project management servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 4, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 4, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 3, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 3, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 3, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 1, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 1, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance