USPTO serial 85019511
MAPEI ADHESIVES SEALANTS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR BUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOBRAL, CHRISTINA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MAPEI ADHESIVES SEALANTS CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR BUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Deerfield Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
Jess M. Collen Practus, LLP100 South Bedford Road, Suite 328Mount Kisco, NY 10549United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Adhesives for use in the cement and mortar industry; adhesives for applying wall and floor coverings, waterproofing and crack isolating products, namely, waterproofing chemical compositions for the installation of tile and stone for both floors and walls; resilient adhesives for applying wall and floor coverings for the installation of vinyl, multipurpose adhesives for applying wall and floor coverings, cove-base adhesives for applying wall and floor coverings; counter-top, floor and wall covering adhesives, namely, ceramic floor and wall tile adhesive, ceramic wall tile adhesive; construction industry adhesives, namely, wall carpet adhesive, multi-purpose adhesive, acrylic cove base adhesive, clear thin spread adhesive, carpet adhesive, pressure sensitive adhesive, premium non-staining multipurpose adhesive, wood floor adhesive | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Adhesive sealant and caulking compounds; waterproof sealants | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Cement mixes for skim coating, concrete, marble, tile or wood; non-metallic building materials, including, mortars, plaster, grouts, products for floor preparations, asphalt-based roofing mastics, self-leveling flooring underlayments; nonmetal sub-floor membrane for residential and commercial soundproofing use, waterproofing system comprised of non-metal wall system elements designed to prevent entry of moisture and to prevent growth of mold; concrete patching and repair compound; cement mixes for skim coating, concrete, marble, tile, wood, vinyl flooring | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 16, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 11, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 15, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 8, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 31, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |