USPTO serial 85019762
Serial No. 85019762
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RHIM, ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85019762?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Cupertino, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lisa G. Widup
LISA G WIDUP APPLE INC1 INFINITE LOOP# MS36-4TMCUPERTINO, CA 95014-2083Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in reviewing, storing, organizing, and playing pre-recorded audio content, sold as a feature of handheld mobile digital electronic devices comprised of digital audio and video players, handheld computers, personal digital assistants, and electronic personal organizers | ACTIVE | Sep 13, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 26, 2014 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 3, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jan 27, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2012 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 29, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 2, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 4, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 24, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |