Drawing for MOBI MASS OPINION BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

USPTO serial 85019841

MOBI MASS OPINION BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MOBI MASS OPINION BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Monica B. Richman

Monica B. Richman Dentons US LLPWACKER DR. STATION, 233 SOUTH WACKER DR.P.O. BOX 061080CHICAGO, IL 60606-1080

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software and downloadable computer software and applications used to enable customers for business and marketing information purposes to access data, beliefs, user generated content and derived insights therefrom relevant to them and mapping, classifying, aggregating, and sorting and extracting the information in raw, packaged and/or visualized formACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 27, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 26, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 25, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 9, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 8, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 4, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 4, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 5, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Apr 27, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 27, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 24, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Apr 24, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 31, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 30, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 27, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 28, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 28, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 30, 2011DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 28, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 3, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 13, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 6, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 29, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 27, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 24, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance