USPTO serial 85020388
ALI'S RUNWAY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HENRY, NAKIA D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 129 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ALI'S RUNWAY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William P. Matthews
WILLIAM P MATTHEWS FOULSTON SIEFKIN LLP1551 N WATERFRONT PKWYSTE 100WICHITA, KS 67206 4466Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Organizing and conducting a fashion show for charitable fundraising purposes | ABANDONED | Mar 10, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2011 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 18, 2011 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 8, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2011 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 3, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 13, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 26, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 10, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 7, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 9, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 2, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |