Drawing for ALEX'S SNACKS & NUTS

USPTO serial 85020718

ALEX'S SNACKS & NUTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CRAWFORD, MARY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALEX'S SNACKS & NUTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James D. Stevens

JAMES D. STEVENS REISING ETHINGTON P.C.PO BOX 4390TROY, MI 48099-4390UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029snacks, namely, veggie chips, fried green beans, fried peas; processed nuts; roasted nuts; processed edible seeds; processed edible sunflower seed kernels; wasabi peas; dried fruit mixes; trail mix consisting primarily of nuts and dried fruit; snack mix consisting primarily of dried fruits; snack mix consisting primarily of dried berries; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits, processed nuts and/or raisins; snack mix consisting of dried fruit and processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, and sesame sticks; snack mix consisting primarily of fruit chips and processed nuts; snack mix consisting primarily of processed nuts, seeds, and raisinsACTIVE—
030corn chips; oriental crackers with peas; oriental rice crackers; salted sesame sticks; snack mix consisting primarily of crackers and processed nutsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 15, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jul 9, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 9, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 31, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 30, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 30, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 7, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 7, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 24, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 7, 2011NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 12, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 23, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 10, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 9, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 10, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 9, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 28, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance