USPTO serial 85021189
CORDBLOODPLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CASTRO, GIANCARLO
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CORDBLOODPLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Mississauga ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Diane M. Lambillotte
DIANE M. LAMBILLOTTE ARNOLD & PORTER LLP777 S FIGUEROA ST FL 44LOS ANGELES, CA 90017-5800UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in managing storage of blood, retaining data relating to properties, volumes, test results and statuses according to acceptable specifications, inventory and location of stored blood and facilitating correspondence with and billings to clients/donors | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 10, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 5, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 2, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |