USPTO serial 85021590
THE CHAMPAGNE LODGE & LUXURY SUITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ROACH, APRIL K
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE CHAMPAGNE LODGE & LUXURY SUITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Willowbrook, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael R Collins
MICHAEL R COLLINS COLLINS & COLLINS8 S MICHIGAN AVENUESUITE 1414CHICAGO, IL 60603-3372Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Hotels | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2012 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2012 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 7, 2011 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 3, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2010 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2010 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 15, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |