USPTO serial 85022182
Serial No. 85022182
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TRUSILO, KELLY JEAN
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 85022182?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shauna M. Wertheim
SHAUNA M. WERTHEIM THE MARBURY LAW GROUP, PLLC11800 SUNRISE VALLEY DRIVESUITE 1500RESTON, VA 20191Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics; non-medicated preparations all for care of the skin, hair, and scalp; body and beauty care cosmetics; lotions for face and body care; shampoos | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | Fruit-based snack food; nut-based snack foods; potato-based snack foods; soy-based snack foods; tofu-based snacks; vegetable-based snack foods | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal based snack food; cheese flavored puffed corn snacks; chocolates and chocolate based ready to eat candies and snacks; multigrain-based snack foods; granola snacks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Besins Healthcare, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Besins Healthcare, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 27, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 26, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 23, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 12, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 26, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 1, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 3, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 20, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | TAEA | TEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |