Drawing for BIOSURFACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES

USPTO serial 85022225

BIOSURFACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 4043496Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Oct 18, 2011
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with BIOSURFACE ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Lim

Karen Lim Fross Zelnick Lehrman & Zissu, P.C.4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOORNew York, NY 10036UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Medical research and development of synthetic bioactive peptidesSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 25, 2018C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 5, 2017CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE - ADDRESS UPDATED—
Jan 31, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 5, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2016REM1COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 1, 2015ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2015REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Oct 14, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Oct 18, 2011R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Sep 12, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 7, 2011CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2011EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 7, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 7, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Sep 6, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Sep 3, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 3, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 2, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2011EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 2, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 2, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 3, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 3, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 3, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 3, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 3, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 3, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance