Drawing for THE X FACTOR

USPTO serial 85022274

THE X FACTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MANOR, THOMAS M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE X FACTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Weinberg

Steven M. Weinberg Holmes Weinberg, PC30765 Pacific Coast HighwaySuite 411Malibu, CA 90265

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Camera cases; Cameras; Cases for electronic diaries; Cases for mobile phones; Cases for pocket calculators; CD cases; CD players; Cellular phone accessory charms; Computer game software; Decorative magnets; Downloadable computer game programs; Downloadable computer graphics; Downloadable image file containing artwork, text, audio, video, games and Internet Web links relating to a talent competition; Electronic diaries; Electronic day planners; Electronic game software for cellular telephones; Fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier or protection for electronic devices, namely, MP3 players, mobile telephones, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; Gaming machines, namely, slot machines and video lottery terminals; Gaming machines, namely, devices which accept a wager; Headsets for mobile telephones; Holders for magnetically encoded gift cards; Magnetically encoded debit cards; Interactive video game programs; Magnetic coded gift cards; Mobile telephones; MP3 players; Personal digital assistants (PDA); Pocket calculators; Pre-paid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; Pre-recorded electronic and digital media featuring a talent competition; Radios; Video game interactive control floor pads or mats; Video game interactive hand held remote controls for playing electronic games; Video game machines for use with external display screen or monitor; Video game software; Interactive educational software featuring musical instrument instruction; electric hair appliances, namely, braiders, wrappers, irons, crimpers, curlers, curling irons, rollers, straighteners; battery-operated hair appliances, namely, braiders, wrappers, irons, crimpers, curlers, curling irons, rollers, straighteners; computer software for creating, recording, editing and transmitting music and other audio material; printers. picture projectors; digital photo frames for displaying digital photos; electronic audio tape recorder; digital audio tape player and recorder; pre-recorded audio and video media featuring music; interactive educational software featuring singing instructions and karaoke music; karaoke player and recorder; downloadable electronic newsletters in the field of entertainment and relating to an ongoing television series and featuring a talent competition; downloadable electronic publications in the nature of magazines or books in the field of entertainment and relating to an ongoing television series and featuring a talent competitionACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 1, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 1, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 31, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 5, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 13, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
May 5, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 17, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 11, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 11, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 4, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 21, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 21, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 7, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 26, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 26, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 7, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 5, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 1, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 1, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 1, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 6, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 6, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 15, 2012NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2012PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 25, 2012CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 25, 2012XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jan 25, 2012GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jan 25, 2012CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 25, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 20, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 15, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 19, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 19, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 27, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
Apr 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 27, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance