USPTO serial 85022711
INTERJOB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ULRICH, NANCY G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with INTERJOB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph A. Sebolt
JOSEPH A. SEBOLT SAND & SEBOLT4940 MUNSON ST NWCANTON, OH 44718-3615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT SERVICES, PROVIDING A WEBSITE CONTAINING EMPLOYMENT AND RECRUITMENT INFORMATION FOR EMPLOYERS AND JOB SEEKERS, NAMELY, EMPLOYMENT NEWS, JOB POSTINGS, JOB OPPORTUNITIES, JOB CANDIDATE PROFILES AND RESUMES; PROVIDING A SEARCHABLE DATABASE OF EMPLOYERS, JOB POSTINGS, JOBSEEKERS, EMPLOYMENT RELATED INFORMATION; PROVIDING A WEBSITE THAT ALLOWS THE CREATION, POSTING AND TRANSFER OF RESUMES AND CANDIDATE PROFILES; PROVIDING A WEBSITE THAT ALLOWS THE RECEPTION OF JOB POSTING NOTIFICATIONS; AND POSTING OF ADVERTISING FOR OTHERS ON A WEBSITE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2011 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |