USPTO serial 85022773
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
ZWINGENBERG, DE
64673 ZWINGENBERG, DE
64673 ZWINGENBERG, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jessica S. Sachs
Jessica S. Sachs Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C.5445 Corporate DriveSuite 200Troy, MI 48098| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Chemicals used in electroplating, metal and phosphate-layer passivation, and phosphating of metal; chemicals used for depositing a layer of metal on a metal or plastic substrate; chemicals used in preparing metal surfaces for electroplating; chemicals for acid pickling for iron and steel, for decalcifying, deburring, derusting, and descaling, and for aluminum pickling and brightening; etching mordants; chemicals for electrolytic coloration of metal surfaces; all of the foregoing goods for use in metal finishing | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 002 | [ Blackening colorants for black coatings on iron and steel; colorants for use on ferrous and non-ferrous metals; anti-corrosive coatings for use in the metal finishing industry; all of the foregoing goods for use in metal finishing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 004 | [ lubricants for use in metal finishing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1989 |
| 042 | [ Chemistry consultation; chemical analyses in the field of electroplating for others; chemical process analyses for others in the field of electroplating; quality control analysis and advice and quality assurance analysis and advice for others in the field of electroplating baths and electroplating processes; monitoring of electroplating baths and processes in order to provide chemical and technological advice with respect thereto; providing chemical, scientific and technological advice to electroplating companies regarding electroplating baths and processes; technical and scientific experiments and tests of electroplating baths and processes in the field of electroplating; scientific and technological services, namely, testing in the field of protection of metals from corrosion; environmental compatibility testing; rental of control and regulation software and hardware for electroplating companies; engineering services, namely, technical project planning in the field of electroplating ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1989 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2021 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| Jan 27, 2021 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 26, 2021 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 2, 2020 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2020 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 28, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 5, 2017 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2016 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 27, 2011 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2011 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 20, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 7, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2010 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 12, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 7, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |