Drawing for HARVESTLAND

USPTO serial 85022826

HARVESTLAND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHELI, ANGELA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HARVESTLAND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rebecca A. Liebowitz

Rebecca A. Liebowitz Venable LLPP.O. BOX 34385WASHINGTON, DC 20043-9998UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Vegetable-based meat substitutes; veggie burger patties; turkey burger patties; meat, beef, seafood; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetable-based meat substitutes; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, pork, or beef; Prepared meals consisting primarily of vegetable-based meat substitutes; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, seafood, poultry, pork, or beef; soy burger patties; textured vegetable proteins for use as a meat substitute; prepared or packaged vegetable based entrees; prepared or packaged soy based entrees; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of vegetables; Vegetable based snack goods, appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Soy or Legume based snack foods, appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Soy or Legume-based meat substitutes; legume-based burger patties; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of soy or legume-based meat substitutes; Prepared meals consisting primarily of soy or legume-based meat substitutesACTIVE—
030Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of grains or bread based products; Prepared meals consisting primarily of grain or bread based products; Grain or Bread- based snack foods, appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Grain snack bars; Grain based energy barsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
May 27, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 23, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 23, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 14, 2014CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2014MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 28, 2014EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 16, 2014EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 16, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 11, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 10, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 8, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 12, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2013NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - MAILED—
Mar 5, 2013TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Mar 5, 2013PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 5, 2013PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 18, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 5, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Sep 4, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Aug 23, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Jul 19, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 17, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 17, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 17, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 16, 2012CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2012COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2012NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 2, 2011NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 19, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 17, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 12, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 11, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 11, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 15, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 18, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 12, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 11, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 30, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
Apr 29, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Apr 29, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance