USPTO serial 85022869
HYDROSTABLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with HYDROSTABLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JON O. WEBSTER
JON O. WEBSTER BAUSCH & LOMB INCORPORATED1 BAUSCH AND LOMB PLROCHESTER, NY 14604-2799UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | SURGICAL, MEDICAL, DENTAL AND VETERINARY APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS, EYES AND TEETH; OPHTHALMIC, OCULAR AND EYE RELATED IMPLANTS, APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS; INTRAOCULAR LENSES; PRE-LOADED INTRAOCULAR LENS INSERTERS; INTRAOCULAR LENS INSERTERS; INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANTS; INTRAOCULAR IMPLANTS; HOLDERS FOR INTRAOCULAR LENSES; LENSES (INTRAOCULAR PROSTHESES) FOR SURGICAL IMPLANTATION; MEDICAL, SURGICAL AND MICROSURGICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTATION AND DEVICES FOR USE IN OPHTHALMIC, OCULAR AND EYE-RELATED PROCEDURES; OPHTHALMIC, OCULAR AND EYE-RELATED SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, APPARATUS AND DEVICES; MEDICAL AND SURGICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS, AND DEVICES USED IN DIAGNOSING EYE CONDITIONS AND PERFORMING OPHTHALMIC, OCULAR AND EYE-RELATED SURGICAL PROCEDURES, AND COMPONENT PARTS THEREOF; SURGICAL APPARATUS, INSTRUMENTS AND DEVICES USED TO INJECT INTRAOCULAR LENSES; MATERIAL USED FOR LENSES; MEDICAL, SURGICAL, OPHTHALMIC, OCULAR, REFRACTIVE, AND EYE-RELATED LASERS, ABERROMETERS, CORNEAL TOPOGRAPHERS, MICROKERATOMES, KERATOMES AND BLADES, PHACOEMULSIFICATION DEVICES, HAND HELD OPHTHALMIC SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS, ENDOSCOPES, TONOMETERS AND CORNEAL SHIELDS; IMPLANTABLE MEDICAL DEVICS; KNIVES AND CUTTERS FOR SURGICAL USE AND PURPOSES; SURGICAL, OPHTHALMIC, AND OCULAR INSTRUMENTS, APPARATUS, AND DEVICES FOR USE IN EYE SURGERY; APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS FOR NON-INVASIVE SURGERY; CORNEAL SHIELDS AND SPLINTS FOR MEDICAL OR SURGICAL USE; ARTIFICIAL LENSES FOR IMPLANTATION IN THE EYE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 5, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |