USPTO serial 85023079
KIDDOPOTAMUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4210507Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 18, 2012
- Examiner
- DOMBROW, COLLEEN M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with KIDDOPOTAMUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Leawood, KS
Leawood, KS
Woonsocket, RI
Woonsocket, RI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cheryl A. Clarkin, Esq.
Cheryl A. Clarkin, Esq. Adler Pollock & Sheehan P.C.8th FloorOne Citizens PlazaProvidence, RI 02903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Covers for baby strollers and children's car seats; waterproof liners and pads for lining children's car seats and strollers; waterproof vehicle seat liners; shade covers for baby strollers; vehicle seat cover in the nature of a protective mat that covers the seat for use with an infant or child car seat; infant/child protective barrier, namely, an adjustable fitted covering for shopping carts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 3, 2003 |
| 020 | Adjustable, removable infant body support mats not for medical purposes for use with infant carriers, strollers, and car seats; head support cushion for use with infant and toddler car seats and strollers; waterproof booster seat liners; portable infant changing kit consisting primarily of padded diaper-changing mat and attached storage pockets; infant/child protective barrier, namely, an adjustable fitted covering for high chairs; padded covers for use on various straps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 31, 2000 |
| 024 | Contoured baby blanket, which securely slips around baby; diaper-changing pads not of paper; child's portable plastic, vinyl and textile placemats; placemats made of plastic; children's blankets; children's security blankets; fabric covers for use on various straps | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 26, 2001 |
| 025 | swaddling clothes, namely, adjustable wrap for use with baby; clothing, namely, wrap-arounds; infant and toddler one-piece clothing; infant sleepers; infant wear; one-piece garment for infants and toddlers; sleep products for infants, namely, adjustable wrap for use with an infant; infant-wearable blankets, namely, baby buntings; infants' or children's bibs, namely, plastic bibs; sleeping garments | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 28, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kiddopotamus & Company
- Other trademarks owned by Kiddopotamus & Company
- Other trademarks owned by Summer Infant (USA), Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Summer Infant (USA), Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named KIDDOPOTAMUS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 19, 2019 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 18, 2017 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 22, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 20, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 18, 2012 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 28, 2012 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Aug 11, 2012 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2012 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 31, 2012 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 16, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 14, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 15, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 6, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 21, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 19, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 19, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 15, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 10, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 5, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |