USPTO serial 85023747
FONALITY CONNECT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DAHLING, KRISTIN M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FONALITY CONNECT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Culver City, CA
Culver City, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Brian R. Coleman
Brian R. Coleman PERKINS COIE, LLP3150 Porter DrivePalo Alto, CA 94304UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware; telephones; computer software for enabling voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) communications; Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems comprised of telephones, IP telephones, computer servers, and telephone switchboards and exchangers; computer software programs for use in integrating computer telephony in the field of computer networks; computer hardware and software appliance comprised of a server and disk drives for use in managing various aspects of communications for small businesses in the nature of voice, chat, messaging, email, and telecommuter network management; Computer software programs for managing and integrating call center queues; Computer software for enabling voice-over-Internet-protocol (VoIP) communications | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing voice communication services via the Internet; telephony services, namely, local and long distance telephone services and voice over Internet protocol (VoIP) services provided via the Internet; Internet telephony services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technical support services, namely, troubleshooting in the nature of diagnosing computer hardware and software problems for computer hardware, software, Private Branch Exchange (PBX) systems and telephony systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2011 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 1, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 7, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 17, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 23, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |