USPTO serial 85023840
REALTIMENEIGHBORHOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with REALTIMENEIGHBORHOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Philip I. Frankel
PHILIP I. FRANKEL BOND SCHOENECK & KING PLLC1 LINCOLN CTR STE 1800SYRACUSE, NY 13202-1355UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Broadcast communication services, namely, transmitting emails, faxes, text messages and telephone voice messages to designated recipients for others | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing on-line non-downloadable software for businesses to use in managing and providing the current status to its clientele regarding appointments, schedules, calendars, reservations, product pickup and personal travel information | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Real Time Neighborhood, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Real Time Neighborhood, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named REALTIMENEIGHBORHOOD
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 8, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 24, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 18, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 8, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 11, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 7, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 13, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |