USPTO serial 85023940
OPERATIONAL ANALYTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 18, 2011
- Examiner
- KEATING, MICHAEL P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPERATIONAL ANALYTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rowland Richards
ROWLAND RICHARDS PHILLIPS LYTLE LLP1 HSBC CTR STE 3400BUFFALO, NY 14203-2834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business consulting services to assist businesses, companies and other commercial entities enhance profits | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 1, 2011 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2018 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 18, 2011 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Sep 9, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE MAILED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 2011 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 30, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Apr 30, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |