USPTO serial 85026202
GROWING UP GROM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GROWING UP GROM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nina Freeland-Ringel
NINA FREELAND-RINGEL CALIFORNIA COAST LEGAL GROUP2244 FARADAY AVE STE 140CARLSBAD, CA 92008-7208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Baby layettes for clothing; Belts; Belts made out of cloth; Bottoms; Children's and infants' cloth bibs; Cloth diapers; Hoods; Infant and toddler one piece clothing; Infant cloth diapers; Jackets; Jerseys; Non-disposable cloth training pants; Short sets; Swaddling clothes; Tops; Wearable garments and clothing, namely, shirts; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 2, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2013 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2013 | ERTP | TEAS RESPONSE TO PETITION DEFICIENCY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 9, 2013 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 6, 2013 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 21, 2013 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 1, 2013 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 5, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 1, 2012 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 22, 2012 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Mar 22, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 21, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 12, 2012 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 12, 2011 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 17, 2011 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 12, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 13, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 17, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 11, 2011 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |