USPTO serial 85026365
EDHANCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARL III, FRED
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EDHANCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Elk Grove Village, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott J. Slavick
SCOTT J. SLAVICK BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEPO BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610-0395UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | food antioxidants, food flavor enhancers, food flavor precursors, namely, chemicals added to precurse flavor without the presence of actual flavor, and food flavor adjunctives, namely, materials providing separate effect from food flavor such as superior mouth feel | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | selected dairy products; namely, cheese, whey, butter, buttermilk solids and blends thereof | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | food flavors, not essential oils; food preservatives, not essential oils; emulsifiers for use in food products; and food flavor enhancers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 10, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 10, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 10, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 3, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |