Drawing for ULTRABLOCK

USPTO serial 85026614

ULTRABLOCK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS, JULIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ULTRABLOCK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Edward J. Chalfie

EDWARD J. CHALFIE HUSCH BLACKWELL SANDERS WELSH & KATZ120 S RIVERSIDE PLZ STE 2200CHICAGO, IL 60606-3912UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary supplements; nutritional supplements; dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for therapeutic purposes; dietary food supplements; dietary supplemental drinks; dietary supplemental drinks in the nature of vitamin and mineral beverages; dietary supplements; dietary supplements for human consumption; enzyme food supplements; food supplements; food supplements, namely, antioxidants; health food supplements; herbal supplements; homeopathic supplements; liquid nutritional supplement; meal replacement and dietary supplement drink mixes; mineral food supplements; mineral supplements; natural herbal supplements; powdered nutritional supplement drink mix; protein supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements; vitamin supplements; medicated sun care preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 3, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 25, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Feb 24, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 24, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Jan 30, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Jan 30, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 23, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Jul 21, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jul 21, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jul 21, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 1, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 20, 2010ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Oct 26, 2010ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Oct 5, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Oct 5, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 30, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 30, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 16, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 5, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED
May 4, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
May 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance