Drawing for FREEDOM MOBILITY

USPTO serial 85026782

FREEDOM MOBILITY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ORNDORFF, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FREEDOM MOBILITY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Melissa L. Heywood

MELISSA L. HEYWOOD ACCUPRO TRADEMARK SERVICES LLP702 - 401 WEST GEORGIA STREETVANCOUVER, BC, V6B5A1CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Bathtub and shower grab bars made of metalACTIVE—
007Wheel chair lifts for use in the home; manually-operated stair lifts, power-operated stair liftsACTIVE—
010Canes for medical purposes, crutches; manually-operated invalid patient lifts, power-operated invalid patient lifts, massage chairs, non-heating medical cushions, medical back supportsACTIVE—
011Raised toilet seats; toilet accessories, namely, plastic handles that are affixed to toilet seats; bathroom commodes; multiple position bath seats; bath and shower faucetsACTIVE—
012Wheelchair cushions; motorized and unmotorized scooters; wheel chairs; power-operated wheel chairsACTIVE—
020Bathtub and shower grab bars not made of metal; shower stools and patient care shower chairs; manually-operated hospital beds, power-operated hospital beds; chair cushionsACTIVE—
027Rubber bath matsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 7, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 7, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 4, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 9, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 1, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 17, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 9, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 31, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 31, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 31, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 16, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 3, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance