CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for A APP PLACE

USPTO serial 85027148

A APP PLACE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with A APP PLACE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Alan S. Cooper

ALAN S. COOPER WILEY REIN LLP1776 K ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006-2304UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable search software to allow users to perform electronic business transactions via a global computer network, namely, to allow users to research and identify computer software applications and to allow users to purchase and/or download computer software applicationsACTIVE—
035online retail store services featuring downloadable computer softwareACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 20, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 7, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 7, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 7, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 7, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 6, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 6, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 6, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2010GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Dec 8, 2010GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 8, 2010CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 17, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 9, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 15, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 15, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2010MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance