USPTO serial 85027198
COLRX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 119
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COLRX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Winnipeg, MANITOBA, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Elizabeth D. Lewen
ELIZABETH D. LEWEN SHERRILL LAW OFFICES, PLLC4756 BANNING AVE STE 212WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110-3206UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | dietary supplements in liquid form to relief joint pain and stiffness and promote mobility | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2014 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 25, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 23, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 9, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 4, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 6, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 4, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |