Drawing for TRAFFICMASTER

USPTO serial 85027683

TRAFFICMASTER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RADEMACHER, MARK A
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRAFFICMASTER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles Quinn

CHARLES QUINN GRAHAM CURTIN, P.A.4 HEADQUARTERS PLZMORRISTOWN, NJ 07960-3963UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
039provision of automatic parking and self-storage facilitiesACTIVEFeb 1, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 6, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 6, 2011CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE—
Dec 6, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 5, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2011APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Nov 16, 2011PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 15, 2011PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Nov 15, 2011TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Nov 15, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 19, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 18, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 13, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 11, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 7, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 7, 2011CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 29, 2011SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 28, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 26, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 26, 2011EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 23, 2010NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2010NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 26, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 11, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 11, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 6, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 5, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 4, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance