Drawing for TECHUS

USPTO serial 85028325

TECHUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TECHUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LuAnn Cserr

LuAnn Cserr Chace Ruttenberg & Freedman, LLPOne Park Row, Suite 300Providence, RI 02903UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management and development services in the field of educational institutionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 25, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 25, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2014EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jan 21, 2014EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 21, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2013EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 24, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 23, 2013EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 18, 2013EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 18, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2013TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 1, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 19, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 19, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 10, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 9, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 23, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 23, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 23, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Feb 21, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 19, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 24, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 24, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 20, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 19, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 19, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 19, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 3, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 22, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 20, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 20, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 7, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 6, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance