USPTO serial 85029050
KEIKO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BIBB, SCOTT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with KEIKO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
TOLUCA Lake, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ken Shibata
KEN SHIBATA APEX JURIS, PLLC12733 LAKE CITY WAY NESEATTLE, WA 98125-4490UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | blank computer mediums, namely tapes, discs, and external memories; blank CDs, blank DVDs, computer hard disc drives; computer chassis; cables for connecting computers and external devices or mediums; joysticks for computers, and portable gaming devices; monitor screens for computers and TVs; cursor control devices, namely, computer mice, digitizer tablets, touch pads, trackballs; headsets for use with computers; arm rests for computers and wrist rests for computers; internal cooling fans for notebook computers; cooling devices for notebook computers, namely, computer cooling pads; loud speakers; audio speakers; bass speakers; microphones, web cams; movie projectors; controllers for gaming machines, computers, audio players; CPU holders; wrist support for computers; keyboards for computers, PDAs and phones; computer keypads; keyboard covers; battery chargers; protective film, namely, fitted plastic films known as skins for covering and providing a scratch proof barrier or protection for electric devices, namely, MP3 players, mobile telephones, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants, laptops and portable media players, portable video players, portable music players and global positioning systems; protective covers for cell phones, laptops and portable media players, portable video players, portable music players, MP3 players, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; protective cases for cell phones, laptops and portable media players, portable video players, portable music players, MP3 players, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; protective sheets of films for cell phones, laptops and portable media players, portable video players, portable music players, MP3 players, smart telephones, digital cameras, global positioning systems and personal digital assistants; straps, namely mobile phone straps; computer stands specifically designed for holding computers; mouse pads; optical filters for computer screens; bags and cases for computers, batteries, cameras, portable music players, headsets for computers, mobile phones, portable audio players, portable video players, PDAs, portable video players, portable voice recorders, camcorders; computer stands specifically designed for holding computers, printers, computer keyboards, PDAs, mobile phones, portable music players, portable media players, and portable video players; computer peripherals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 25, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 18, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2013 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 13, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 9, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |