USPTO serial 85029090
ISLAND FUSION GOURMET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHUO, EMILY M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ISLAND FUSION GOURMET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marc Kesten
MARC KESTEN MARC J. KESTEN9220 NW 72ND STPARKLAND, FL 33067-2619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Anchovy paste; Apple butter; Apple puree; Baked beans; Bean curd; Bean dip; Butter; Cheese; Cheese spreads; Chili; Chocolate milk; Chorizo; Cooking oil; Cottage cheese; Cream cheese; Dairy-based food beverages; Dairy-based spreads; Dips; Dried beans; Fried plantain; Fruit preserves; Fruit purees; Fruit salads; Fruit-based food beverage; Fruit-based snack food; Fruit-based spreads; Garlic-based spread; Guacamole; Hummus; Jams; Jellies; Jellies and jams; Jellies for food; Jellies, jams; Jerky; Marmalades; Meat; Meat-based spreads; Nut butters; Nut-based snack foods; Pate'; Peanut butter; Peanut-based food beverages; Pickles; Potato chips; Potato salad; Potato-based snack foods; Poultry; Powdered oils and fats; Preserved fruits; Preserved fruits and vegetables; Processed anchovies; Processed bee pollen for food purposes; Roasted nuts; Seafood; Snack dips; Snack food dips; Soup mixes; Soups; Soups and preparations for making soups; Vegetable salads; Vegetable-based spreads; Yogurt; Yogurt drinks; Yogurts | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Bakery goods; Bakery products; Bean paste; Beverages made of tea; Bread; Cakes; Chili paste for use as a seasoning; Chili powders; Chili sauce; Chili seasoning; Chutney; Chutneys; Cocoa spreads; Coffee; Coffee-based beverages; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Dessert puddings; Dipping sauces; Dumplings; Flan; Frozen foods, namely, grain and bread based appetizers, hors d'oeuvres, and canapés; Frozen yogurt; Grain-based snack foods; Gravy; Herb tea; Herbal food beverages; Herbal tea; Honey; Horseradish; Hot sauce; Ice cream; Marinade mixes; Marinades; Pasta; Pastries; Pesto; Popcorn; Puddings; Rice pudding; Salad dressing; Salad dressings; Sauces; Seasonings; Sorbet; Spice rubs; Spices; Sweets; Tea; Tea-based beverages | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 13, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 12, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |