Drawing for ORGANIC DEFENSE

USPTO serial 85029272

ORGANIC DEFENSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NEVILLE, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORGANIC DEFENSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Akua Boyenne, Esq.

468 N CAMDEN DR # 200BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90210-4507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; Dietary and nutritionally fortified food products adapted for immune support use; Dietary beverage supplements for human consumption in liquid and dry mix form for immune support purposes; Dietary drink mix for use as a meal replacement; Dietary food supplements; Dietary pet supplements in the form of pet treats; Dietary supplement for eliminating toxins from the body; Dietary supplemental drinks; all the foregoing made with organic ingredientsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 29, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 10, 2012ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Oct 26, 2011ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 15, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 12, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 12, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 11, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 10, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 10, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 1, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 2011DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Jul 8, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 21, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Jun 9, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 8, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 4, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 4, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 13, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 4, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 4, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 19, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 19, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 12, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 7, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 6, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance