USPTO serial 85029300
NUVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHELI, ANGELA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NUVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark M. Friedman
MARK M FRIEDMAN DR. MARK FRIEDMAN LTD.MOSHE AVIV TOWER, 54TH FLOOR7 JABOTINSKY ST.RAMAT GAN, 52520Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound system for placement in an abdominal belt comprising of audio controller and speakers, for transmitting music and sounds to a fetus; Abdominal belts containing speakers and audio transmitters for purposes of transmitting music and sounds to a fetus, not for medical purposes; Sound system for placement in toys for babies and children comprising of audio controller, speakers and a music player, for transmitting music and sounds; all included in International class 9 | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
| 028 | Musical toys for babies and children; electronic toys for babies and children; toys for babies and children in which a sound system can be installed; toys for babies and children which play music and sounds designed to be attached to car seats; toys for babies and children which play music and sounds designed to be attached to strollers; toys for babies and children which play music and sounds designed to be attached to cribs; toys for babies and children which play music and sounds designed to be attached to high chairs; sound producing toys for babies and children; musical toys for babies and children; toys for babies and children containing speakers and audio transmitters for purposes of transmitting music and sounds; all included in International class 28 | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Creation, design and development in the field of babies' and children's toys; Product research and development in the field of babies' and children's toys; Research and development of technology in the field of babies' and children's toys; Design and development of multimedia products for babies and children; Design and development of sound systems for babies and children; all included in International class 42 | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 25, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |