Drawing for PLASTIC SURGERY PULSE

USPTO serial 85029637

PLASTIC SURGERY PULSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
REIHNER, DAVID
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PLASTIC SURGERY PULSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Annette P. Heller

Annette P. Heller Heller & Associates400 Chesterfield CenterSuite 400Chesterfield [StLouis], MO 63017

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041educational services, namely, providing on-line courses in the field of plastic surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 18, 2011MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 18, 2011ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2011TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 19, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 29, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 13, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 7, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 1, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 31, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 31, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 16, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance