USPTO serial 85029985
TENDERCROP FARM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TENDERCROP FARM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kevin W. Lawless, Esq.
KEVIN W. LAWLESS, ESQ. KEVIN W. LAWLESS, ATTORNEY AT LAW6 HARRIS STNEWBURYPORT, MA 01950-2603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Bacon; Bean dip; Beef; Beef patties; Beef slices; Beef stew; Beef stock; Beef tallow; Beverages consisting principally of milk; Beverages having a milk base; Beverages made from yoghurt; Bologna; Boneless skinless chicken tenderloin; Broth; Butter; Butter substitutes; Buttermilk; Caesar salad; Caffeine-coated nuts; Candied fruit; Candied fruit snacks; Candied nuts; Canned cooked meat; Canned fish; Canned fruits; Canned fruits and vegetables; Canned or bottled fruits; Canned or bottled vegetables; Canned peanuts; Canned pork and beans; Canned tomatoes; Canned vegetables; Canned, cooked or otherwise processed tomatoes; Cheese; Cheese and cracker combinations; Cheese food; Cheese spreads; Cheese, namely, gouda, cheddar and processed; Chicken; Chocolate milk; Chowder; Coffee whiteners consisting principally of dairy products; Cottage cheese; Cream; Cream cheese; Dairy products excluding ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt; Dairy-based beverages; Dairy-based chocolate food beverages; Dairy-based dips; Dairy-based spreads; Dips; Drinkable soups; Egg nog; Egg yolks; Eggs; Fruit salads; Fruit salads and vegetable salads; Fruit-based filling for cakes and pies; Fruit-based fillings for cobblers; Garlic-based spread; Half and half; Ham; Hen eggs; Hot dogs; Jellies and jams; Kielbasa; Margarine; Marinated meat and poultry; Marmalades and jams; Meat; Milk; Nut and seed-based snack bars; Pork; Potato chips; Potato crisps; Poultry; Poultry, namely, chicken and turkey; Ripened cheeses; Sausages; Turkey; Turkey burger patties; Uncooked hamburger patties; Vanilla milk; Vegetable-based spreads; Whipped cream; Whipping cream; White cheese | ACTIVE | Sep 7, 1993 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 16, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 10, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 7, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |