Drawing for ZIMMER LDC

USPTO serial 85030083

ZIMMER LDC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZIMMER LDC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie A. Gumm and John F. Hoffman

STEPHANIE A. GUMM AND JOHN F. HOFFMAN BAKER & DANIELS LLP111 E WAYNE ST STE 800FORT WAYNE, IN 46802-2600UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Orthopedic prostheses and implants, namely, artificial acetabular cups and their parts; and related surgical instrumentation for implantation of acetabular cupsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 28, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Feb 28, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Feb 25, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2010GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 2010CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Sep 10, 2010TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 10, 2010CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 20, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 14, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 14, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance