Drawing for BRUSKI

USPTO serial 85030262

BRUSKI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DESAI, BRIN ANDERSON
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with BRUSKI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JungJin Lee

JungJin Lee Lee, Lee & Associates, P.C.2531 Jackson RoadSuite 234Ann Arbor, MI 48103

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVEJan 8, 2011

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 2, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 1, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 11, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 1, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 1, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 1, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 9, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 9, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 9, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 17, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 26, 2013TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 26, 2013CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 19, 2013ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 27, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2012GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2012GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 24, 2012CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 3, 2012TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 2, 2012CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2012ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
May 1, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 28, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 26, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 8, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 8, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 1, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 10, 2011AAUANOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED—
Feb 9, 2011IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Jan 21, 2011AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 21, 2011IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jan 20, 2011EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jan 20, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 10, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 7, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance