USPTO serial 85031308
FIST 2 FIST STREET WEAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FIST 2 FIST STREET WEAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Beanies; Boxing shorts; Gym shorts; Hats; Hooded sweat shirts; Shorts; Sweat pants; Sweat shirts; T-shirts; Tank tops | ACTIVE | Feb 15, 2010 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by F2F Sports, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by FIST 2 FIST
- Other trademarks owned by FIST 2 FIST
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named FIST 2 FIST STREET WEAR
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2012 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 16, 2012 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2012 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 18, 2012 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 14, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2012 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 11, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 11, 2012 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 30, 2011 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | MAB7 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Dec 9, 2011 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Nov 30, 2011 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Nov 25, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 22, 2011 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | INCS | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 22, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 22, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 5, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 30, 2011 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 5, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 2, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 19, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2010 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 8, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |