Drawing for ZEE SOURCE

USPTO serial 85031524

ZEE SOURCE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZEE SOURCE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

LORINDA CHURCH

900 MAIN ST S BLDG 2SOUTHBURY, CT 06488-4237UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business management advisory services relating to franchising provided to franchisees via a website; Franchising, namely, consultation and assistance in business management, organization and promotion provided to franchisees via a websiteACTIVE—
041Business education services, namely, providing courses and seminars in the field of franchising to aid franchisees in the operations of their franchised business; Professional coaching services in the field of operating franchisesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 24, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 24, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 21, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 27, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Dec 27, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 7, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 18, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 14, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 14, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Oct 5, 2011RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 5, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 5, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 14, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 14, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 3, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 5, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 5, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 13, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 10, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance