Drawing for NOURISHES SCALP,TRANSFORMS HAIR

USPTO serial 85033038

NOURISHES SCALP,TRANSFORMS HAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAYES, LAURIE ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NOURISHES SCALP,TRANSFORMS HAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa W. Rosaya

LISA W. ROSAYA BAKER & MCKENZIE LLP1114 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10036-7703UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps; perfumery; essential oils; deodorants and antiperspirants; non-medicated hair care preparations; hair colorants, hair dyes, hair lotions, hair waving preparations, hair shampoos, hair conditioners, hair sprays, cosmetic hair dressings, hair lacquers, hair mousses, hair glazes, hair gels, hair moisturizing creams, conditioner and gel, hair liquid in the nature of hair tonic, hair preservation treatments in the nature of hair conditioners, hair oils, hair tonic, hair creams, non-medicated preparations for the bath and/or shower; non-medicated toilet preparations in the nature of soap, toilet water, talcum powder for toilet use; non-medicated skin care preparations; cosmeticsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 11, 2013CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 11, 2013COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2012ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jan 23, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 23, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Nov 2, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jun 21, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 26, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 26, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2011PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY—
Feb 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 25, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 31, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 29, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 29, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2010GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2010GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 25, 2010CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Aug 19, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 11, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance