Drawing for BUBBBLES

USPTO serial 85034078

BUBBBLES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IN, SUNG HYUN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BUBBBLES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Reena J. Patel

REENA J. PATEL THE LAW OFFICE OF REENA J. PATELPMB 928 PPP 10000Saipan, MP 96950-8900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021Baskets for waste paper littering; Bath accessories, namely, cup holders; Bath products, namely, body sponges; Boxes for dispensing paper towels; Ceramic tissue box covers; Cotton ball jars; Cups; Dispensers for facial tissues; Dispensers for paper towels; Glass jars; Glass storage jars; Rails and rings for towels; Rails and rings for towels, not of precious metal; Shaving brush holders; Shower caddies; Soap boxes; Soap brackets; Soap containers; Soap dishes; Soap dispensers; Soap holders; Soap holders and boxes; Toilet tissue holders; Toothbrush cases; Toothbrush holders; Towel bars; Towel rails and rings; Towel rails and rings, not of precious metal; Towel rings; Waste basketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2012MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 17, 2012ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 10, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 29, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 28, 2012AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 6, 2012NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2012TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 6, 2012PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2012PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 6, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 17, 2012EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 18, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 16, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 16, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 16, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 17, 2011NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 22, 2011NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 22, 2011PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 16, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 21, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 20, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 19, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 30, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 30, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 14, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 13, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance