USPTO serial 85034558
SOPHIA MIND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4574156Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 29, 2014
- Examiner
- VAGHANI, MAYUR C
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SOPHIA MIND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
Rio de Janeiro, BR
Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
Rio de Janeiro, BR
Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
Rio de Janeiro, BR
Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald M. Kachmarik
Ronald M. Kachmarik COOPER LEGAL GROUP LLC6505 ROCKSIDE RD. STE 330INDEPENDENCE, OH 44131-2371UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Qualitative and quantitative market research services; conducting qualitative and quantitative public opinion polls; commercial management of techniques and methods for applying qualitative and quantitative market research and public opinion polls; Analysis of project costs; Business data analysis; Economic forecasting by developing techniques and methods for applying propensity models for purchases and cancellations of purchases; Conducting business and commercial feasibility studies of commercial projects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 042 | Computer modeling services, namely, developing and structuring of computer structuring business intelligence models to orientate strategic corporate actions and database shaping; data mining; Computer services, namely, analysis of execution of computer programs in order to assess characteristics of performance and performance of objects through a series of standard tests; Conducting of physical feasibility studies of commercial projects | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
- Other trademarks owned by DBM PESQUISA E CONSULTORIA DE MARKETING FEMININO LTDA
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SOPHIA MIND
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 5, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 29, 2019 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2014 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 13, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 13, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 23, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 2, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 22, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 14, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 25, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2012 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 23, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 25, 2010 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 20, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |