USPTO serial 85035136
DAEMON CONSULTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DAEMON CONSULTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew Mirsky
Andrew Mirsky Mirsky & Company, PLLC2301 N Street, NWSuite 313Washington, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Computer education training; Computer education training services; Educational services, namely, developing and conducting training courses and distribution of training materials in connection therewith for subject matters as requested by customers; IT training services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Computer security consultancy; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of identification, support, and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; IT consulting services; (Based on Intent to Use) Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Consultancy with regard to webpage design; Consultation services in the field of search engine optimization; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting in the field of virtualization technologies for enterprises and businesses; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Electronic legal discovery consulting services; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2008 |
| 045 | Consulting in the field of intellectual property licensing; Patent and industrial property consultation | ACTIVE | Feb 2, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2011 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Sep 19, 2011 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 14, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 31, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 1, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |