Drawing for DAEMON CONSULTING

USPTO serial 85035136

DAEMON CONSULTING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, NICHOLAS A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DAEMON CONSULTING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew Mirsky

Andrew Mirsky Mirsky & Company, PLLC2301 N Street, NWSuite 313Washington, DC 20037

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Computer education training; Computer education training services; Educational services, namely, developing and conducting training courses and distribution of training materials in connection therewith for subject matters as requested by customers; IT training servicesACTIVE—
042(Based on Use in Commerce) Computer security consultancy; Consultancy in the field of software design; Consulting services in the field of computer-based information systems for businesses; Consulting services in the field of identification, support, and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; IT consulting services; (Based on Intent to Use) Computer security consultancy in the field of scanning and penetration testing of computers and networks to assess information security vulnerability; Consultancy with regard to webpage design; Consultation services in the field of search engine optimization; Consultation services in the fields of selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; Consulting in the field of configuration management for computer hardware and software; Consulting in the field of IT project management; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting in the field of virtualization technologies for enterprises and businesses; Consulting services in the field of cloud computing; Consulting services in the field of hosting computer software applications; Consulting services in the field of providing online, non-downloadable software and applications; Consulting services in the field of software as a service (SAAS); Electronic legal discovery consulting services; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and servicesACTIVEFeb 2, 2008
045Consulting in the field of intellectual property licensing; Patent and industrial property consultationACTIVEFeb 2, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2011MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 19, 2011ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 16, 2011EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2011GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2011GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 23, 2011CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 28, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 19, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 14, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 31, 2010TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 1, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance