USPTO serial 85035885
Y8U
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JACKSON, STEVEN W
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Y8U?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kenton R. Mullins
KENTON R MULLINS STOUT UXA BUYAN & MULLINS LLP4 VENTURESUITE 300IRVINE, CA 92618-7384Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Foodstuffs and staple foods of plant origin prepared for consumption or conservation as well as auxiliaries intended for Ayur Vedic improvement or the improvement of the flavor of food, namely, coffee, tea, cocoa; beverages with a coffee base, cocoa-based beverages, and chocolate-based beverages with milk; preparations made from cereals and cereals of rice | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Mineral waters; aerated waters; non-alcoholic drinks, namely, non-alcoholic beverages containing Ayur Vedic essences and flavorings; de-alcoholised drinks, namely, beers, wines, fruit drinks, and fruit juices; and syrups, preparations and Ayur Vedic preparations for making non-alcoholic flavored beverages and non alcoholic beverages having Ayur Vedic essences | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Services for the development of the mental faculties of persons, as well as services intended to engage the attention as well as those having the basic aim of edification, amusement or recreation of people, namely, education training, entertainment and the provision of information relating to organizing community sporting and cultural activities in the fields of Ayur Vedics, yoga, wellness and non-religious holistic lifestyle issues, but excluding providing courses of instruction at the undergraduate, graduate and professional levels and distributing course materials in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Hermann, Matthias
- Other trademarks owned by Hermann, Matthias
- Other trademarks owned by Bauhofer, Ulrich
- Other trademarks owned by Bauhofer, Ulrich
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named Y8U
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 21, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 13, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2016 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 20, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2015 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 2, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 1, 2015 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 5, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 2, 2014 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 2, 2013 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2013 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 6, 2013 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 22, 2011 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 22, 2011 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 22, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 6, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 4, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2011 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2011 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 3, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 1, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |