Drawing for MESHCONNECT

USPTO serial 85035905

MESHCONNECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SNAPP, TINA LOUISE
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESHCONNECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gerald B. Rosenberg

GERALD B. ROSENBERG NEWTECHLAW260 SHERIDAN AVE STE 208PALO ALTO, CA 94306-2009UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Integrated circuits, hardware modules, and computer software for facilitating wireless radio frequency communications with stationary and portable computer systems, notebooks, netbooks, net pads, tablet devices, personal digital assistants, and cellular telephones; radio communication machines and apparatus for fixed stations; radio transmitters; radio receivers; wireless access point (WAP) devices; antennas; gateway routers in the nature of computer control hardware, and modems; fixed and portable automation controls for residential, business and industrial automation; security alarm controllers; electronic readers and controllers for controlling access to a premises; security alarms; anti-intrusion alarms; intrusion detectors, namely, motion detectors; personal security alarms; and electronic motion sensitive switches; electrical and heating systems comprised of controllers, light sensors, thermostats, and electrical resistance heating wires; glass breakage monitoring sensors; wireless keypads; alarm monitoring systems comprised of video cameras and audio speakers; smoke and fire detectors; fire alarms; alarm stations comprised of fire alarms and remote controls for fire alarms; personal transponders; electronic garage door openers; voice control systems comprised of voice sensors and voice recognition softwareACTIVEJul 25, 2008

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 13, 2012PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 27, 2012PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 12, 2012APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Dec 16, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 18, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 22, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 22, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 22, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 29, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 29, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2010MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED—
May 17, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 14, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance