USPTO serial 85037012
QFX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QFX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
El Segundo, CA
El Segundo, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jane Shay Wald
JANE SHAY WALD IRELL & MANELLA LLP1800 AVENUE OF THE STARS STE 900LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-4276UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Consulting services for custom fabrication of selective membranes and reverse osmosis services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 15, 2014 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 15, 2014 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 8, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2014 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2013 | NOAC | CORRECTED NOA MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2013 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2013 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 21, 2013 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2013 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2013 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | RGEX | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2013 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2013 | ERRS | TEAS REQUEST FOR REINSTATEMENT | — |
| Jun 10, 2013 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 10, 2013 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2013 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2013 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 25, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 24, 2012 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 10, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 8, 2011 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2011 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2011 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2011 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 18, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 23, 2011 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 17, 2011 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 17, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 16, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 15, 2010 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 18, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |