USPTO serial 85037064
BUILD-IT STEP BY STEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAVACHE, LINDA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BUILD-IT STEP BY STEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John F. Hoffman
JOHN F. HOFFMAN FAEGRE BAKER DANIELS LLP300 N. Meridian StreetSuite 2700Indianapolis, IN 46204Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 24, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 2014 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 11, 2013 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 4, 2013 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 22, 2013 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 6, 2012 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2012 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2011 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2011 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2010 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |