Drawing for PRIMUS POWER

USPTO serial 85037246

PRIMUS POWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TOOLEY, DAVID E
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PRIMUS POWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark E. Miller

MARK E. MILLER O'MELVENY & MYERS LLPTWO EMBARCADERO CENTER28TH FLOORSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Liquid flow batteries used for bulk storage of energy from an electrical infrastructureACTIVE—
039Providing a website featuring information in the field of electrical grid energy storageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 16, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 8, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 23, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Oct 16, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 10, 2013RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2013ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 8, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 19, 2012DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 3, 2012RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 18, 2011CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Nov 18, 2011COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2011RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 23, 2011GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2011CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 2, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 2, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Sep 16, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2010FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 7, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 7, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 19, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance