USPTO serial 85037356
NOVO JEWELRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NOVO JEWELRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Novo Limited Liability Company
Annapolis Junction, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew F. Williamson, Esquire
MATTHEW F. WILLIAMSON, ESQUIRE LAW OFFICES OF MATTHEW F. WILLIAMSON, LLC2119 OAK LODGE RDCATONSVILLE, MD 21228-4716UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Beads for use in the manufacture of jewelry; Bracelets; Charms; Charms for collar jewelry and bracelet; Jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2011 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 2011 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 26, 2011 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 26, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 2010 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2010 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |