Drawing for SAFE WATER FOR A THIRSTY WORLD

USPTO serial 85037518

SAFE WATER FOR A THIRSTY WORLD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PERRY, KIMBERLY B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFE WATER FOR A THIRSTY WORLD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel Weiss

Joel Weiss Weiss & Arons LLP1540 Route 202Suite 8Pomona, NY 10970

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Water treatment equipment, namely, water filtration units; water filtration and purification apparatusACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of Water Filtration and Purification SystemsACTIVE—
042Research and Development relating to Water Filtration and PurificationACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2013MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 30, 2013ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 9, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2013EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2013AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Feb 27, 2013EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 28, 2012EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 28, 2012EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 28, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 28, 2012NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 3, 2012NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2012PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 14, 2011NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2011PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 23, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 1, 2011XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2011GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 1, 2011CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 1, 2011ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 1, 2011CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 31, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 31, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2011PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 31, 2011PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 7, 2011MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 7, 2011ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 9, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Feb 9, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 9, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 7, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance