Drawing for Serial No. 85037769

USPTO serial 85037769

Serial No. 85037769

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHUO, EMILY M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 85037769?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cory M. Amron

CORY M AMRON VORYS SATER SEYMOUR AND PEASE LLPPO BOX 2255COLUMBUS, OH 43216-2255UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025pads for the straps of shoesACTIVESep 5, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2012MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2012ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 30, 2012EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 14, 2012EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Nov 21, 2011GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2011GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2011CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Nov 15, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 4, 2011ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 26, 2011ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2011EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 26, 2011JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 26, 2011EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 26, 2011GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 26, 2011GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 26, 2011CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2011AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Apr 5, 2011PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Mar 1, 2011TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2011CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 28, 2011TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 16, 2011ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Feb 9, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 7, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 3, 2011ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 3, 2011REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2010GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 26, 2010CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 24, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2010MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED—
May 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance