Drawing for SAFFRON ROAD

USPTO serial 85037826

SAFFRON ROAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
EINSTEIN, MATTHEW T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAFFRON ROAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin E. Silverman

ROBIN E. SILVERMAN GOLENBOCK EISEMAN ASSOR BELL & PESKOE711 Third AvenueNew York, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepackaged dinners consisting primarily of seafood with pasta; frozen or prepared meals consisting primarily of fish and vegetables; processed fruits consisting of apples, oranges, bananas, apricots, dates; hummus; processed vegetables, garden salads, fruit salads, vegetable salads, salami, bologna, turkey, cheese; yogurt-based beverages; soy-based beverages being milk substitutesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2014MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 13, 2014ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 12, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 11, 2013EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2013EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jun 7, 2013EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 5, 2013EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jan 5, 2013NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Jan 4, 2013DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 4, 2013EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Dec 31, 2012IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Dec 31, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 20, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Dec 7, 2012DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2012EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 7, 2012ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 12, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 11, 2012EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jun 7, 2012EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 7, 2012EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 8, 2012EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Feb 8, 2012NOACCORRECTED NOA MAILED—
Feb 7, 2012DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 7, 2012EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2012IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
Jan 23, 2012TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 13, 2012INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Dec 7, 2011AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 6, 2011DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2011EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 6, 2011ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Dec 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 8, 2011EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jun 6, 2011EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 6, 2011EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 6, 2011EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 7, 2010NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 12, 2010PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 22, 2010NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 9, 2010PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2010ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 27, 2010CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Aug 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2010XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 26, 2010CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 26, 2010ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 26, 2010CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 26, 2010DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 2010NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
May 17, 2010NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance